Improving Critical Thinking Skill of Junior High School Students through Science Process Skills Based Learning
DOI:
10.29303/jppipa.v6i2.428Published:
2020-06-13Issue:
Vol. 6 No. 2 (2020): JulyKeywords:
Critical Thinking skill, Science Process Skill, Junior High SchoolResearch Articles
Downloads
Additional Files
How to Cite
Downloads
Metrics
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate impact the science process skill-based learning on critical thinking skills of Junior High School students. Subjects were eighth grade students of Rengel Junior High School 1 that were selected by purposive random sampling. Measurement data by means of science process skills test and critical thinking skill test was analyzed by using inferential statistical one-tailed t-test and linear regression. The results showed that implementation of science process skill-based learning was effective to improve the critical thinking skill of Junior High School studentReferences
Alismail, H. A., & McGuire P. (2015). 21st Century Standarts and Curriculum: Current Research and Practice. Journal of Education and Practice, 6 (6), 150-154.
Ambross J., Les, M., & Sylvan, B. 2014. The Implementation and Development of Science Process Skills in the Natural Sciences: A Case Study of Teachers’ Perceptions. Journal Africa Education Review, 11(3), 459-474. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/18146627.2014.934998
Arends, R. 2012. Learning to Teach Edisi Kesembilan Buku 1. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
Arslan, S. (2012). The Influence of Environmental Educational on Critical Thinking And Environmental Attitude, Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 1 (55), 902-909. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.579
Atkamis, H., & Nilgun, Y. (2010). Determination of the Science Process Skills and Critical Thinking Skill Levels. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 2 (2010), 3282-3288. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.502
Dagar, V., & Yadav, V. (2016). Contuctivism: a paradigm for teaching and learning. Art and social science journal, 7(4), 1-4. doi:10.4172/2151-6200.1000200
Demir, M., Hasan, B., Sinem, T., & Mehmet, A. D. (2011). Quadruple Thinking Critical Thinking. Procedia Social and Behavioral Science, 1 (2011), 545-551. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.02.065
Ennis, R, H. (2011). The Nature of Critical Thinking: an Outline of Critical Thinking Disposition and Abilities. Last revisied emertius professor: University Illions.
Facione, P. A.. (2011). Critical Thinking: What It Is and Why It Counts, Retrieved from http://jmorante@insightassessment.com
Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (Vol. 7). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hammond, L. D., Lisa, F., Chana, C. H., Brigid, B., & David, O. (2020). Implication for Educational Practice of the Science Learning and Development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97-140. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791
Hassard, J. 2005. The Art Teaching Science. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heong, Y.M., Yunos, J.M., Othman, W., Hassan, R., Kiong, T.T. & Mohamad, M.M. (2014). Disparity of Learning Style and Higher Order Thinking Skills among Technical Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204: 143-152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.127
Hilman. (2014). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing dengan Mind Map terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Hasil Belajar IPA. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains, 2 (4): 221-229.
Irwanto, Anip, D. S., & Eli, R. (2019). Using Inquiry-Based Laboratory Instruction to Improve Critical Thinking and Scientific Process Skill Among Preservice Elementary Teachers. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 80 (2019), 151-170. doi: 10.14689/ejer.2019.80.8
KaramustafaoÄŸlu, S. (2011). Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of Science Student Teachers Using I Diagrams. International Journal of Physics & Chemistry Education, 3(1), 26-38. Retrieved from http://www.ijpce.org/index.php/IJPCE/article/view/99
Karsli, A., & Alipasa, A. (2014). Developing a Laboratory Activity by Using 5E Learning Model on Student Learning of Factor Affecting the Reaction Rate and Improving Scientific Process Skill. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 143 (2014), 663-668. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.07.460
Kazeni, M.M.M. (2005). Development and Validation of a Test Integrated Science Process Skills for The Further Education and Training Learners. (Unpublished master thesis), Pretoria university of south Africa
Khaeruddin. (2017). Model Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Keterampilan Proses Sains (Model FBKPS). Gowa: Pustaka Almaida
Khalick, F.A. (2012). Teaching with and About Nature of Science, and Science Teacher Knowledge Domains. Science & Education, 22 (9), 2087–2107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-012-9520-2
Lai, E. R. (2011) Critical Thinking: A Review Research Report. United Kingdom: Pearson Always Learning.
Lunenburg, F.C. (2011). Critical thinking and constructivism techniques for improving student achievement. In National Forum of Teacher Education Journal. 21(3), 1-9.
Maesek, A., & Sulaiman, Y., (2012). The Impact of Instructional Methods on Critical Thinking: A Comparison of Problem-Based Learning and Conventional Approach in Engineering Education. International Scholarly Research Network Education, 1(2012), 1-6. doi: https://doi.org/10.5402/2012/759241
Magno, C. (2010). The role of Metacognitive Skill in Developing Critical Thinking. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2010), 137-156.
National Research Council. (2012). A Frame Work for K-12 Science Education Practices, Crosscutting Concept, and Core Ideas. Washington DC: National Academy Press.
Nugraha, A. J., Hardi, S., & Endang, S. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Ditinjau Dari Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Motivasi Belajar Melalui Model PBL. Journal of Primary Educating, 6 (1): 35-43. doi: 10.15294/jpe.v6i1.14511
Nur, M. (1998). Proses Belajar Mengajar dengan Pendekatan Keterampilan Proses. Surabaya: SIC Surabaya.
Nuryanti, L., Siti, Z., & Markus, D. (2018). Analisis Kemampian Berpikir Kritis Siswa SMP. Jurnal pendidikan, 3 (2), 155-158.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015 Results in Focus: What 15-years-olds know and what they can do with what they know. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org
Özgelen, S. (2012). Students’ Science Process Skills within a Cognitive Domain Framework. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education. 8(4), 283-292. doi: https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2012.846a
Pieterse, T., Heather, L., & Hesta, F., (2016). Critical Thinking Ability of 3rd Year Radiography students. Health sa geshodeid; 21 (2016), 381-390
Rahayu, S. (2016). Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Siswa Melalui Pembelajran Kimia Berkonteks Socioscientific Issues (SSI) Dan Nature of Science (NOS). Paper presented at seminar nasional kimia dan pembelajarannya 2016.
Ridho, S., Ruwiyatun, R., Subali, B., & Marwoto, P. (2020). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa Pokok Bahasan Klasifikasi Materi dan Perubahannya. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 6(1), 10-15. doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v6i1.194
Solihah, R., Agus, A. P., & Erin, R. G. 2016. Penerapan Pembelajaran Investigasi Kelompok Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains Ditinjau Dari Intelligence Quotient Siswa. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA), 2(2), 1-11. doi:https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v2i2.39
Suprapto, N. (2016). What should educational reform in Indonesia look like? Learning from the PISA science scores of East-Asian countries and Singapore. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 17(2), 1 -21.
Turiman, P., Jizah, O., Adzliana, M. D. & Kamisah. (2012). Fostering the 21st Century Skill through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skill. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59(2012), 110-116. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253
Vaithyanathan,V., & Sivakumar P. (2013. Effectiveness Of Cognitive Constructivist Approach in The Acquisition of Science Process Skills. International Journal of Innovative Research & Development, 2 (1), 56-64.
Walker, P. & Finney, N. (2006). Skill Development and Critical Thinking in Higher Education. London: Higher Education Research & Development Unit,University College.
Wass, R., Toni, H., & Alison, M. (2011). Scaffolding critical thinking in the zone of proximal development. Teaching in Higher Education, 19 (6), 671-684. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2010.489237
Woolfolk, A. H., & Hughes, M. M. & Walkup, V. (2008). Psychology in Education. New York: Pearson.
Zoller, U., Ben-Chaim, D., & Ron, S. (2000). The Disposition Toward Critical Thinking of High School and University Science Students: An Inter-Intra Isreaeli-Italian Study. International Journal of Science Education, 22(6), 571-582. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/095006900289679
Author Biographies
Diego Pradana, Science Education Study Program Postgraduate, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
Mohamad Nur, Science Education Study Program Postgraduate, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
Nadi Suprapto, Science Education Study Program Postgraduate, State University of Surabaya, Indonesia
License
Authors who publish with Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY License). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics, and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).