Multidimensional Science Education on Performance Assessment Comprehensively with Collaborative Project Learning Based Model: Philosophy Perspective
DOI:
10.29303/jossed.v3i2.2278Published:
2022-10-31Issue:
Vol. 3 No. 2 (2022): OctoberKeywords:
Performance assessment; Comprehensive, Collaboration project learning, multidimensional science education, PhilosophyArticles
Downloads
How to Cite
Downloads
Abstract
Competency-based learning requires an assessment instrument capable of comprehensively measuring learning objectives in the cognitive, psychomotor and affective domains. Therefore, an alternative assessment model based on performance is needed. The purpose of writing this article was to find out whether it is possible to comprehensively assess performance based on collaborative project learning in multidimensional science education from a philosophical perspective through literature study. Performance appraisal is a continuous assessment process through the process of collecting various activity-based information as an object of assessment in various ways and tools. Based on the results and discussion of the literature review, performance assessment is a continuous assessment process using various strategies and methods (multi-methods) where in this article the author combined collaborative project-based learning methods. Project based learning provides opportunities for students to explore content and learning experiences using various ways that are meaningful to themselves and to conduct experiments collaboratively by combining various interrelated subjects. Exploration of authentic and complex problems based on tasks that have been designed to produce joint work for reporting project results. Collaborative project learning between subjects is essentially a learning system that allows students to actively seek, explore, and discover concepts and principles authentically by involving various groups as assessors through self-assessment and Peer Assessment. The comprehensive performance appraisal process is a multidimensional process and information is obtained from the assessment process on aspects of cognitive skills, attitudes, critical thinking, process skills and products as an integral part of the learning process by empowering students and educators.
References
Akhyar, M. (2008). Vocational Competency Assessment Model for Industrial Technology Vocational High School Students. Doctoral dissertation, unpublished, Yogyakarta State University, Yogyakarta.
Alquraan, MF, Basharah, MS, & Al-Bustanji, MA, (2010). Oral and written feedback and their relationship with using different assessment methods in higher education, International Journal of Applied Educational Studies Al-Yarmouk: 7(1). 43-58.
Anderson, OW & Krathowhl, D.R (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman
Azwar S. (2005). Human attitude: Theory and its measurement. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Babbie, E. (2004). The practice of social research (10th Ed.). USA: Wadsworth: Thompson.
Berk, RA (1986). Performance assessment: Methods and applications. London: The John Hopkins University Press.
Chatterji, M. (2002). Models and methods for examining standards-based reforms and accountability initiatives: Have the tools of inquiry answered pressing questions on improving schools? Review of Educational Research, 72, 3, p.345-386
Cohen, BH (1998). Explaining psychological statistics. (2 & Sons, Inc. ed.). New York; John Wiley
Deming, M., Doyle, K. & Woods, S. (1993). A comprehensive assessment plan for professional peparation programs in health education at Eastern Illinois University. Journal of School Health, 51, 210-213.
Djemari, M. (2008). The role of national exams in improving the quality of education, Seminar Papers for the Alumni Meeting of the Graduate Program of UNY. Yogyakarta: UNY Postgraduate Program.
Fosnot, C. T., (1989). Enquiring Teachers Enquiring Leaners Constructivist Approach for Teaching. New York: Teacher College Press.
Grant, M.M. (2002). Getting A Grip of Project Based Learning: Theory, Cases and Recomandation. North Carolina: Meredian A Middle School Computer Technologies.
Hargreaves, A., Earl, L. & Schmidt, M. (2002). Perspectives on alternative assessment reform,American Educational Research Journal, 39(1), 69-96.
Henning, JE & Robinson, V. (2004). The teacher work sample: Implementing standards based performance assessment. The Teacher Educator, 39(4), 231-248
Hutchings, B. (2006). Principles of Enquiry-Based Learning. Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning.
Hutchings, W. (2007). Enquiry-Based Learning: Definitions and Rationale. Centre for Excellence in Enquiry-Based Learning.
Hutchings, W. (2007). The philosophical bases of Enquiry-Based Learning. Centre forExcellence in Enquiry-Based Learning
Klein, C.J (2006). Linking competency-based assessment to successful clinical practice. Journal of Nursing Education, 45(9), 379-383.
Kolenda, R.L. (2007). Jappanese lesson study, staff development, and science education reform - The neshaminy story. Science Educator, 16(1), 29-33.
Kuper, D.B (2006). Reconsidering the minimum competency test strategy in No Child Left Behind: An agenda for reform. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 11(1).
Marhaeni, N. (2005). The effect of portfolio assessment and achievement motivation in learning English on the ability to write in English. Doctoral dissertation, unpublished, State University of Jakarta, Jakarta.
Marzano, RJ, (1994). Lessons from the field about outcome-based performance assessment, Educational Leadership, 51(5), 44-50.
Moseley, JL & Hastings, NB (2005). The forgotten link om the intervention chain. Performance Improvement, 44(4),
Simpson, ML & Nist, S (1992). Toward defining a comprehensive assessment model for college reading, Journal of Reading: 35(6), 452- 458.
Tillema, H.H, Kessels, J.W.M., & Meijers, F. (2000). Competencies as building blocks for integrating assessment with instruction in vocational education: a case from the Netherlands. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher education, 3(3), 265-278,
Wolf, A. (1998). Portfolio assessment as national policy: The National Council for Vocational Qualifications and its quest for a pedagogical revolution, Education and Training, 5(3), 413-445.
Author Biographies
Sudirman Sudirman, Universitas Qamarul Huda Badaruddin Bagu
Muhammad Sarjan, University of Mataram
Joni Rokhmat, University of Mataram
Hamidi Hamidi, University of Mataram
Iswari Fauzi, Politeknik Kesehatan Mataram
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Sudirman Sudirman, Muhammad Sarjan, Joni Rokhmat, Hamidi Hamidi, Iswari Fauzi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Science and Science Education, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Science and Science Education.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
