Success Rate in Single Posterior Dental Implant Installation: A Literature Review
DOI:
10.29303/jossed.v7i2.13457Published:
2026-10-26Downloads
Abstract
Single posterior tooth loss can impair masticatory function, occlusion, and oral health. Dental implants offer an effective treatment; however, their long-term success depends on biological, biomechanical, prosthetic, and technological factors. This review aims to analyze the factors influencing the clinical success of single posterior dental implants, particularly implant techniques, restorative materials, retention systems, and digital technologies. A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant clinical studies published between 2015 and 2024 were reviewed based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were analyzed descriptively to identify factors affecting implant success and complications. The reviewed studies reported implant success rates of approximately 94–97%. Implant success was associated with appropriate prosthetic planning, balanced occlusal loading, and suitable restorative materials. Zirconia and lithium disilicate demonstrated favorable clinical performance, while screw-retained restorations offered advantages in maintenance. Digital technologies improved implant placement precision, although biological and mechanical complications remained important challenges. In conclusion, the long-term success of single posterior dental implants depends on proper treatment planning, surgical techniques, restorative materials, and digital technology. Evidence-based clinical management is essential to achieve predictable and sustainable outcomes
Keywords:
Digital implantology Evidence-based prosthetics Guided surgery Osseointegration Screw-retained Single posterior dental implant ZirconiaReferences
Bathiya, A., Pisulkar, S. G., & Beri, A. (2024). Occlusal Changes Following Single Dental Implant Placement in the Posterior Region of Jaws: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 16(8), e68113. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.68113
Bento, V. A. A., Rosa, C. D. D. R. D., Lopes, L. F. de T. P., Lemos, C. A. de A., Miyashita, E., & Pellizzer, E. P. (2025). Digital analysis of occlusion variations in single posterior implant-supported fixed prostheses: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trial studies. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 17(4), 247–258. https://doi.org/10.4047/jap.2025.17.4.247
Bosshardt, D. D., Chappuis, V., & Buser, D. (2017). Osseointegration of titanium, titanium alloy and zirconia dental implants: Current knowledge and open questions. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 22–40.
Creugers, N. H. J., Kreulen, C. M., Snoek, P. A., & de Kanter, R. J. A. M. (2000). A systematic review of single-tooth restorations supported by implants. Journal of Dentistry, 28(4), 209–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0736-5748(99)00078-7
Derksen, W., Wismeijer, D., Flügge, T., Hassan, B., & Tahmaseb, A. (2019). The accuracy of computer-guided implant surgery with tooth-supported, digitally designed drill guides based on CBCT and intraoral scanning. A prospective cohort study. Clinical oral implants research, 30(10), 1005–1015. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13514
Donker, V. J. J., Raghoebar, G. M., Jensen-Louwerse, C., Meijer, H. J. A., et al. (2022). Monolithic zirconia single tooth implant-supported restorations with CAD/CAM titanium abutments in the posterior region: A 1-year prospective case series study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13069
Gargallo-Albiol, J., Tavelli, L., Barootchi, S., Monje, A., & Wang, H. L. (2021). Clinical sequelae and patients' perception of dental implant removal: A cross-sectional study. Journal of periodontology, 92(6), 823–832. https://doi.org/10.1002/JPER.20-0259
Gheisari, R., Eatemadi, H., & Alavian, A. (2017). Comparison of the Marginal Bone Loss in One-stage versus Two-stage Implant Surgery. Journal of dentistry (Shiraz, Iran), 18(4), 272–276. Retrieved from https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29201970/
Guljé, F. L., Raghoebar, G. M., Gareb, B., Vissink, A., & Meijer, H. J. A. (2024). Single crown restorations supported by 6-mm implants in the resorbed posterior mandible: A 10-year prospective case series. Clinical implant dentistry and related research, 26(3), 642–650. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13326
Halim, A. K., & Poedjiastoeti, W. (2024). Management of dental implant placement in cases of single posterior tooth loss. Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Terpadu, 6(1), 39–41. https://doi.org/10.25105/jkgt.v6i1.20830
Kim, J. J., Lee, J. H., Kim, J. C., Lee, J. B., & Yeo, I. S. L. (2020). Biological responses to the transitional area of dental implants: Material- and structure-dependent responses of peri-implant tissue to abutments. Materials, 13(1), Article 72. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13010072
Kim, S.-Y., Ku, J.-K., Yun, P.-Y., Kim, Y.-K., et al. (2018). A retrospective clinical study of single short implants (less than 8 mm) in posterior edentulous areas. The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics, 10(3), 191–196. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6004347/
1Manfredini, M., Poli, P. P., Giboli, L., Beretta, M., Maiorana, C., & Pellegrini, M. (2024). Clinical factors on dental implant fractures: A systematic review. Dentistry Journal, 12(7), Article 200. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj12070200
1Misch, C. E. (2015). Dental implant prosthetics (2nd ed.). Elsevier. Retrieved from https://www.inspectioncopy.elsevier.com/book/details/9780323078450
Moy, P. K., Nishimura, G. H., Pozzi, A., & Danda, A. K. (2016). Single implants in dorsal areas—A systematic review. European Journal of Oral Implantology, 9(Suppl. 1), S163–S172. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27314123/
Resnik, R. (2021). Contemporary implant dentistry (4th ed.). Elsevier. Retrieved from https://shop.elsevier.com/books/mischs-contemporary-implant-dentistry/resnik/978-0-323-39155-9
Sahrmann, P., Naenni, N., Jung, R. E., Hämmerle, C. H. F., Attin, T., & Schmidlin, P. R. (2023). Ten-Year Performance of Posterior 6-mm Implants with Single-Tooth Restorations: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of dental research, 102(9), 1015–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/00220345231170538
Sailer, I., Barbato, L., Mojon, P., et al. (2023). Single and partial tooth replacement with fixed dental prostheses supported by dental implants: A systematic review of outcomes and outcome measures used in clinical trials in the last 10 years. Clinical Oral Implants Research. https://doi.org/10.1111/clr.13926
Schnutenhaus, C., et al. (2025). Technical complications and marginal bone loss depending on the crown material of dental implants in the posterior region: A 3-year randomized clinical study. Dentistry Journal, 13(9), Article 430. https://doi.org/10.3390/dj13090430
Tagger-Green, N., Fridenberg, N., Segal, S., Levartovsky, S., & Laviv, A. (2023). Effect of posterior implant restorations on adjacent teeth and tissues: A case–control study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 25(3), 473–480. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13207
Thoma, D., et al. (2021). Two short implants versus one short implant with a cantilever: 5-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13541
Thoma, D., et al. (2024). Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing shorter dental implants (6 mm) to longer dental implants (11–15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures: 10-year data. Journal of Clinical Periodontology. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.13954
Tolentino da Rosa de Souza, P., Albini Martini, M. B., Azevedo-Alanis, L. R., et al. (2018). Do short implants have similar survival rates compared to standard implants in posterior single crowns? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research, 20(5), 890–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.12634
Wang, R. R., & Fenton, A. (1996). Titanium for prosthodontic applications: A review of the literature. Quintessence International, 27, 401–408. Retrieved from https://www.quintessence-publishing....-of-the-literature
Wittneben, J. G., Joda, T., Weber, H. P., & Brägger, U. (2017). Screw retained vs. cement retained implant-supported fixed dental prosthesis. Periodontology 2000, 73(1), 141–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.12168
Wright, S., & Drysdale, C. (2012). A dentist's guide to implantology. Association of Dental Implantology
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Susanna Halim, Winda Surta Simbolon, Elizabeth Gloria Surbakti, Vania Pepayosa Sitepu, Insan Munawar Batubara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with Journal of Science and Science Education, agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). This license allows authors to use all articles, data sets, graphics and appendices in data mining applications, search engines, web sites, blogs, and other platforms by providing an appropriate reference. The journal allows the author(s) to hold the copyright without restrictions and will retain publishing rights without restrictions.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in Journal of Science and Science Education.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
